Tom Gilbert / Mbed 2 deprecated Q_BLE_SecureHeartRate

Fork of BLE_SecureHeartRate : should this 'work' i.e. require a secure connection on an nRF51-DK? Hopefully I'm just missing something obvious - or is this broken?

Dependencies:   BLE_API mbed nRF51822

Fork of BLE_SecureHeartRate by Bluetooth Low Energy

Diff: main.cpp

Revision:
11:70342535895d
Parent:
10:d391a5f1df7c
--- a/main.cpp	Fri May 27 16:52:32 2016 +0000
+++ b/main.cpp	Fri May 27 16:55:05 2016 +0000
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
     bool enableBonding = true;
     bool requireMITM   = true;
     uint8_t pass[] = {'0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6'};
-    ble.securityManager().init(enableBonding, requireMITM, SecurityManager::IO_CAPS_DISPLAY_ONLY, pass);
+    ble.securityManager().init(enableBonding, requireMITM, SecurityManager::IO_CAPS_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY, pass);
     
     /* Set callback functions */
     ble.gap().onConnection(connectionCallback);