Thomas Kirchner
Whetstone performance benchmark to compare the speed of my new Nucleo STM32 F401RE board to the Arduino. To summarize, while my Arduino Leonardo knockoff running at 16 Mhz runs through the 1,000 loops in 82 seconds for 1.21MIPS the Nucleo takes only 30-31 seconds and yields 3.2-3.3 MIPS. I would have expected better relative performance from a 32 bit ARM M4 processor over an 8 bit AVR. Maybe it will get better once the FPU is enabled in the online compiler.
Dependencies: ST_401_84MHZ mbed
Whetstone on the Nucleo at 84 MHz:
- Loops: 1000, Iterations: 1, Duration: 30 sec.
- C Converted Double Precision Whetstones: 3.3 MIPS
- Code size: 22.1 kB
Whetstone on the Arduino Leonardo at 16 MHz:
- Loops: 1000Iterations: 1Duration: 82320 millisec.
- C Converted Double Precision Whetstones: 1.21 MIPS
- Code size: 9,086 bytes
History
Whetstone performance benchmark to compare my new Nucleo STM32 F401RE board to the Arduino. While my Arduino Leonardo knockoff at 16 Mhz runs through the 1,000 loops in 82 seconds for 1.21 MIPS the Nucleo takes only 30 secs and yields 3.2 MIPS
2014-04-28, by kirchnet [Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:44:57 +0000] rev 1
Whetstone performance benchmark to compare my new Nucleo STM32 F401RE board to the Arduino. While my Arduino Leonardo knockoff at 16 Mhz runs through the 1,000 loops in 82 seconds for 1.21 MIPS the Nucleo takes only 30 secs and yields 3.2 MIPS
Whetstone performance benchmark to compare my new Nucleo STM32 F401RE board to the Arduino. While my Arduino Leonardo knockoff running at 16 Mhz runs through the 1,000 loops in a mere 82 secs for 1.21 MIPS the Nucleo takes 30 secs and yields 3.3MIPS.
2014-04-28, by kirchnet [Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:38:52 +0000] rev 0
Whetstone performance benchmark to compare my new Nucleo STM32 F401RE board to the Arduino. While my Arduino Leonardo knockoff running at 16 Mhz runs through the 1,000 loops in a mere 82 secs for 1.21 MIPS the Nucleo takes 30 secs and yields 3.3MIPS.