Diff: tools/test/config_test/test04/test_data.py

Revision:

0:f782d9c66c49

--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/tools/test/config_test/test04/test_data.py	Fri Feb 02 05:42:23 2018 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Similar to test1, but this time B2 attempt to define base1_1. Since base1_1
+# is already defined in B1 and F derives from both B1 and B2, this results
+# in an error. However, when building for B2 instead of F, defining base1_1
+# should be OK.
+
+expected_results = {
+    "f": {
+        "desc": "attempt to redefine parameter in target inheritance tree",
+        "exception_msg": "Parameter name 'base1_1' defined in both 'target:b2' and 'target:b1'"
+    },
+    "b2": {
+        "desc": "it should be OK to define parameters with the same name in non-related targets",
+        "target.base2_1": "v_base2_1_b2",
+        "target.base2_2": "v_base2_2_b2",
+        "target.base1_1": "v_base1_1_b2"
+    }
+}
+