First of all, I'm french so sorry for my poor english.
I run mbed studio 0.4.0 recently ( one month) in replacement of visual studio + visual GDB.
This tool is exactly what i want : an offline official tool.
I love this tool, it's a great work.
But I have few remarks :
- I'm an electronics teacher and i plan use it in my school but i have the proxy problem (a variant, cannot login but no error message) so it's necessary for me to have an option for enter proxy settings in future.
- I have had some problems on windows 10 x64 : I need to had the path of "local python interpreter" bundled with mbed studio to my system path, after this it will work like a charm.
- Projects locations is fixed in user profile, in my school it's a problem, actually i resolve it by making a "symbolic link" but in future it's useful to have an option to move the projects folder.
- Compilation is slow in effect .... but the problem was identical in visual studio + visual GDB witch use GCC instead of ARMCC, so in my mind it's a windows problem not a mbed studio problem, I have excluded mbed studio folders of windows defender scan and it speed up compilations a little.
But I dont want to be negative !!!! With a location selector for projects folder, a proxy settings options and ability to use "a master copy of mbed os" instead of local copy in each projetc, this tool will be perfect for my usage.
jean-marc
First of all, I really like the use of a familiar text editor (I work a lot with vscode). Since this is a beta I wanted to give in my opinion on the current state of the tool.
Positive
Suggestions
Following points will start with what I don't like and how it could be changed (a suggestion)
Overall, despite the majority of critical points, I really like it. It's something I always wanted and I might consider using it in the future.
PS: is the mbed-os library copied for every new program or does it act like a master-library and just the compiled files are put into the program's folder?