Library that allows for higher resolution and speed than standard mbed PWM library using same syntax (drop-in replacement).

Dependents:   PwmOscillator FastStepDriver TLC5940 CameraTest ... more

FastPWM is a library that unlocks alot more of the potential of the mbed's PWM units than the normal PWM library. It is currently available for the LPC1768, LPC11u24, KLxxZ, K20D50M and most STM32 targets (those lacking are fairly easy to add). (Since I generally forget to update this list, if you want to know if your target is supported see if it compiles).

The two main points it allows for compared to the regular PwmOut library is clock cycle precision PWM and (automated) changing prescalers. It isn't perfect yet, but for now it will have to do ;). For those familiar with version 1, version 2 is almost completely rewritten to add more functions.

Usage

FastPWM is largely a drop-in replacement for the normal PwmOut library. All the same functions are available, with some extras.

Prescaler

Warning

All prescaler options are disabled for 32-bit PWM units currently, the prescaler is fixed at 1

fastpwm.prescaler(value);

With this function you can set the value of the prescaler. Aditionally the second argument of the constructor is used for the same to directly set it from the constructor. It returns the actual prescaler which is set. If the requested one isn't available it is always rounded up (unless it is larger than the maximum prescaler).

There are three options for this function. Any value larger than zero will simply be set. (Yes it is signed, so yes you cannot use the full 32-bit prescaler if your device supports it, I cannot imagine why you possibly would want that). If the value is zero dynamic prescaling is disabled and the current prescaler is returned. If the value is -1 dynamic prescaling is enabled and the current prescaler is returned.

So what is dynamic prescaling? This is the default option for FastPWM, don't use any prescaler option and it is enabled. To start with the negative, it adds quite some processing cycles, so changing the period takes longer. Luckily generally the PWM period is constant. The good part is that it automatically adapts the prescaler unit to give as much accuracy as possible: It gives highest accuracy for the duty-cycle, and also allows you to generate a wide range of periods. For example you can now create a LED blinking at 1Hz with FastPWM on the LPC11u24/Nucleo 16-bit PWM units. (On the KL25Z this isn't possible due to limitted value of the prescaler).

As the nice warning message above says, this is currently only implemented for 16-bit PWM units, simply because normally you won't need it for 32-bit PWM units. For those it is automatically disabled, and you cannot enable it. However for example the majority of the PWM units of the LPC11u24 can't be used to make servo signals with PwmOut, with FastPWM they can.

TL;DR, by default it uses dynamic prescaling. Unless period is changed very often just keep it on default and enjoy your larger range of possible periods and higher accuracy.

Ticks

fastpwm.period_ticks(ticks);
fastpwm.pulsewidth_ticks(ticks);

These two functions allow you to directly write the pwm period and pulsewidth in clock ticks. This is useful if you need to have very little overhead. It is dependent on which device you use, since they have different clock rates. You can get the current clock speed of your device with SystemCoreClock.

Double

PwmOut uses floats for setting the time in seconds, and ints for milliseconds and microseconds. All three of those don't give enough accuracy to fully use the PWM units. Which is why FastPWM uses besides int for milliseconds and microseconds, it uses doubles for seconds and also for microseconds. Generally it is adviced to use these doubles, sometimes you might need to explicitly cast your variables to doubles.

Currently setting pulsewidth in microseconds with an int is a risk with some prescaler values (not on the 32-bit timers). See known-issues.

Adding other microcontrollers

Look at the other device files on how to add other microcontrollers. Functions that need to be implemented:

  • initFastPWM(): Any setups required can be done here. Must set the number of bits of the PWM unit.
  • pulsewidth_ticks( uint32_t ticks ): Set the pulsewidth in ticks
  • period_ticks( uint32_t ticks ): Set the period in ticks
  • getPeriod(): Return the period in ticks
  • setPrescaler(uint32_t reqScale): Set the prescaler. If reqScale is zero, return the current prescaler value only. Otherwise set the requested prescaler, if needed round up to first available prescaler, return the actually set prescaler. If the PWM unit is 32-bit (or for another reason), you can set dynamicPrescaler as false, disabling the dynamic prescaler.

Known Issues

  • Changing the prescaler manually does not adapt periods/pulsewidth
    • Manually re-set the period of each FastPWM object on that PWM unit, this should also set the duty cycle.
  • Changing the period of one FastPWM object does not keep the duty cycle of other PWM objects on that PWM unit constant, but the pulsewidth.
    • Manually re-set the duty cycle of other PWM objects.
  • PwmOut objects run at wrong speed when you use FastPWM
    • Don't use PwmOut objects.
  • On certain prescaler values setting period/pulsewidth in especially microsecond integers, also to lesser extend also millisecond integers, can result in wrong values.
    • The problem is that the number of clock ticks per microsecond/millisecond as integers are pre-calculated for improved speed. However if it isn't an integer number that gives an error.
    • Solution is to preferably use doubles (or ticks). On the 32-bit pwm units this is not an issue, so for them it doesn't matter.
    • I am planning to have a further look into it, but I expect it to stay an issue.

Here the TL;DR is: Preferably set the period/prescaler once at the beginning before setting the duty-cycle/pulsewidth. If that isn't possible, take into account duty cyles need to be set again. And preferably use doubles.

Credits

Some of the ideas are 'loaned' from Jochen Krapf's fork of the original FastPWM: http://mbed.org/users/jocis/code/HighPWM/

History

Replace new/delete with malloc/free for void *. Deleting void pointer is undefined behavior in C++. default tip

12 months ago, by blaze [Wed, 30 Oct 2019 03:00:00 +0000] rev 35

Replace new/delete with malloc/free for void *. Deleting void pointer is undefined behavior in C++.


Removed wait statement which was for debug

2017-09-03, by Sissors [Sun, 03 Sep 2017 19:40:01 +0000] rev 34

Removed wait statement which was for debug


KSDK (K64F) update

2017-09-03, by Sissors [Sun, 03 Sep 2017 16:26:07 +0000] rev 33

KSDK (K64F) update
; Now it should properly synchronize PWM updates again
;
; Serious @mbed, clearing the timer is not a proper synchronisation mechanic for PWM!


Fixed issue where STM32 PWM on MCUs with high clock frequency could be a factor of two too fast

2017-01-01, by Sissors [Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:37:55 +0000] rev 32

Fixed issue where STM32 PWM on MCUs with high clock frequency could be a factor of two too fast


Temporary fix for K64F with new mbed lib:

2016-09-06, by Sissors [Tue, 06 Sep 2016 20:17:21 +0000] rev 31

Temporary fix for K64F with new mbed lib:
; 1. KSDK funtions changed (fixed)
; 2. Mbed uses a completely different mode for the PWM, which screws up my code. (Temp fix, don't call write directly after setting a new period, but wait 1 pwm period)


Should fix for LPC824

2016-03-14, by Sissors [Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:41:49 +0000] rev 30

Should fix for LPC824


Added LPC81x/LPC82x support

2016-03-13, by Sissors [Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:43:18 +0000] rev 29

Added LPC81x/LPC82x support


STM32F3, F4, L4, etc now use the channels number from the mbed library. The others still need to use the manual way.

2016-02-29, by Sissors [Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:18:42 +0000] rev 28

STM32F3, F4, L4, etc now use the channels number from the mbed library. The others still need to use the manual way.


Added extra Nucleo/Disco targets (by https://developer.mbed.org/users/mimi3/)

2016-02-11, by Sissors [Thu, 11 Feb 2016 06:33:59 +0000] rev 27

Added extra Nucleo/Disco targets (by https://developer.mbed.org/users/mimi3/)


Added two more NUCLEO Targets

2016-01-31, by Sissors [Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:29:35 +0000] rev 26

Added two more NUCLEO Targets